On May 30, 2013, USCIS finally
issued the much anticipated Final EB-5 Adjudications Policy Memorandum. 
The Final EB-5 Adjudications Policy Memorandum makes significant changes to and
provides clarifications for the EB-5 Program.  Here are some of the
highlights:
- Less Regional Center Amendments: The new memo states that USCIS does not require formal
     amendments to regional center designation when an RC changes its
     industries of focus, its geographic boundaries, its business plans, or its
     economic methodologies.  Previously, the I-924 listed “acceptable
     amendments” to include some of these. The memo clarifies the non-mandatory
     nature of these business changes.
- An RC’s Geographic Area is Determined by
     Reasonableness:  For the
     first time, USCIS outlined that determinations on the geographic area
     of a regional center are based on the RC’s ability to establish by a
     preponderance of the evidence that the proposed economic activity will
     promote growth in the proposed area. This means that the RC must show that
     the proposed area contributes significantly to the supply chain and labor
     pool of the proposed projects.
- Defines Hypothetical, Actual and Exemplar Projects: The memo states that if a project complies with the
     requirements of a Matter of Ho business plan, it is an “actual
     project.” If the project does not comply with Matter of Ho, it is
     “hypothetical.”  Additionally, an actual project requires more detail
     than a hypothetical. Finally, the memo defines an “exemplar” as an actual
     I-526 petition for a project that USCIS will review for EB-5 compliance,
     including all transactional documents (such as the offering
     materials).  This is important because if USCIS approves an “actual
     project,” USCIS will give deference to the later filed I-526s.  Hypothetical
     projects are not accorded deference at the I-526 stage.
- We decided that already! Deference to Prior Decisions: Deference to already adjudicated matters is one of the
     most significant changes contained within the memo. For example, if USCIS
     approves an I-924’s Matter of Ho compliant business plan, it
     will give deference to this at the later I-526 stage.  I-924 approval
     notices should state whether a project has been approved as an exemplar or
     actual project, thereby being accorded deference in future adjudications.
- Approved the Use of Escrow Accounts: USCIS explicitly approved investor’s use of escrow
     accounts as long as release of funds is immediate and irrevocable upon
     approval of the Form I-526 and acquisition of an immigrant visa or
     approval of Form 1-485 (adjustment of status).
- Bridge financing Permitted If You Just Can’t Wait: If a developer uses bridge financing prior to receipt
     of the EB-5 capital, this will not affect the job creation calculation
     whether or not said financing was contemplated before the EB5 financing.  However,
     it is always a best practice to have contemporaneous evidence of the
     intent to use EB-5 capital.
- USCIS Defers to State Adjudications of TEAs: USCIS will review state determinations of TEAs to see
     whether they used reasonable methodologies, but will otherwise defer to
     state determinations.
- Eventual Acquisition of an Asset Does Not Count as “At
     Risk” Investment: If the
     investor is individually guaranteed the right to eventual ownership or use
     of a particular asset in consideration of the capital contribution, then
     the expected present value of the guaranteed ownership or use does not
     count toward total amount of the investor’s capital contribution in
     determining the amount of money truly at risk.
- Restructure or Reorganization Means (probably) a Total
     Remodel or Significant Addition:
     Plans to convert a restaurant into a nightclub or add crop production to a
     livestock operation would constitute restructuring. This seems to mean
     USCIS wants a complete remodeling or significant addition to the existing
     business. “Reasonable time” to Create Jobs at I-829 is Not a Free
     Pass: Investors need not have created all the jobs at the I-829 stage,
     but need to be in “substantial compliance” and show that they will create
     jobs “within a reasonable time.”  This is not an open-ended
     allowance, but does provide some flexibility. After this time, jobs will
     not be considered unless there is a force majeure. 
- Material changes at I-829 stage? Don’t Fret: An individual investor can proceed with their Form
     I-829 petition to remove conditions even if within the time between I-526
     approval and submission of the Form I-829 a material change occurred to
     the business plan.  As long as the investor can show that they
     satisfy the conditions for removal of conditions, USCIS may still issue an
     approval.
 

 




